MARCH 11TH 2021 THERE WAS ALREADY 80% HERD IMMUNITY BEFORE THE VACCINE PROGRAM EVEN STARTED. A CLINIC IN TEXAS DID A STUDY AND TREATED PATIENTS OVER 50 YEARS OLD AT THE ONSET OF SYMPTOMS WITH A SERIES OF MEDICATIONS INCLUDING MONOCLONAL ANTI BODIES AND THEY REDUCED RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS FROM COVID AND HOSPITALIZATIONS REDUCED BY 85%. NOW THE GOVERNMENT HAS SEIZED SUCH THERAPIES PREVENTING THEM FROM BEING ADMINISTERED TO THOSE IN NEED. WHAT KIND OF CRUEL DRACONIAN EVIL ARE SUCH TACTICS THAT REMOVE VIABLE LIFE SAVING REMEDIES ? WHO EXACTLY IS RUNNING OUR GOVERNMENT NOW ? PRESIDENT PHARMA HIMSELF ??
DOCTORS HAVE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS AMONGST THEMSELVES VIA MEDICAL JOURNALS WORLDWIDE. WE ARE LIVING IN THE AGE OF TECHNOLOGY WHERE INFORMATION CAN BE SHARED INSTANTLY AND WIDESPREAD. WHEN A SUCCESSFUL DISCOVERY IS MADE THAT TREATS AN ILLNESS AND CLEARLY SAVES LIVES IT NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT TO THE FOREFRONT OF THE NEWS WORLDWIDE AND IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENTED FOR MEDICAL USE AMONGST THE MEDICAL COMMUNITIES WORLDWIDE, ESPECIALLY DURING A PANDEMIC. TO BLOCK ANY CRITICAL MEDICAL OBSERVATIONS BY DOCTORS WORLDWIDE OR INFORMATION GIVEN BY ANY INDIVIDUAL, CORPORATION LIKE GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK, BY LEADERS OR GOVERNMENTS IN GENERAL IS A CRIMINAL FORM OF WITHHOLDING INFORMATION RESULTING IN HARM AND POTENTIAL DEATH TO THE MASSES.
INTENTIONAL BLOCKING OF IMPORTANT MEDICAL INFORMATION NEEDED TO SAVE LIVES IS NOT ONLY GROSS NEGLIGENCE BUT GROSS MURDER. IT IS CRIMINAL TO PUSH HARMFUL, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE LOSS OF LIVES AND UNKNOWN HARM FOR THOSE VULNERABLE WHEN OTHER MEDICAL OPTIONS ARE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE AND HERD IMMUNITY HAS ALREADY HAPPENED BY THE GRACE OF NATURAL HUMAN IMMUNITY. COVID WAS ALREADY VIRTUALLY MUTE BEFORE THE VACCINES ROLLED OUT. THE RESULT OF THE ROLLOUT OF MASS VACCINATIONS WAS THAT COVID CASES SPIKED AGAIN TO THEIR HIGHEST NUMBERS AFTER THE VACCINE PROGRAM STARTED. THIS WAS PROVEN IN ISRAEL, ICELAND, ITALY, AMERICA AND ALL COUNTRIES DOING MASS VACCINATIONS.
POLITICIANS AND INDIVIDUALS DEFENDING VACCINES THAT HAVE ZERO PERSONAL TRAINING IN HEALTH, SCIENCE NOR MEDICINE NEED TO BE BANNED FROM PARROTING BIG PHARMA OR OTHER PROPAGANDA SOLELY TO INSTILL FEAR AND MISINFORMATION IN ORDER TO PROMOTE A VACCINE MANDATE.
A PRESIDENT HOLDS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO BE FULLY EDUCATED BY A COMMITTEE OF PROFESSIONALS REPRESENTING ALL VIEWS ON A SUBJECT THAT AFFECTS THE MASSES BEFORE RECOMMENDING ANYTHING PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY, MUCH LESS BEFORE CREATING ANY EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION MANDATE. IF A MILITARY CONCERN IS THE SUBJECT THEN TOP MILITARY OFFICIALS AND TOP PEACE KEEPING OFFICIALS NEED TO BE CONSULTED TO HEAR BOTH SIDES AND ALL POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS. IF A HEALTH PANDEMIC IS THE SUBJECT THEN TOP MEDICAL AND ALTERNATIVE HEALTH ADVISORS WORLDWIDE REPRESENTING ALL POTENTIAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS AT ALL STAGES NEEDS TO BE CONSULTED, NOT A SINGULAR HEALTH CORPORATION WITH ONE OPTION. PRODUCTS THAT PROFIT A SINGULAR COMPANY OR A SINGULAR FORM OF TREATMENT OVER ANOTHER SHOULD BE SCRUTINIZED TO THE HIGHEST DEGREE. THIS IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT WHEN REMEDIES SUCH AS VACCINES THAT REQUIRE YEARS OF TRIAL STUDIES MAY BE DELAYED MONTHS OR LONGER WHILE PEOPLE ARE DYING WHO COULD HAVE BEEN SAVED BY USING SIMPLE ALTERNATIVE HEALTH PROTOCOLS IMMEDIATELY. TO NOT TAKE THE TIME TO LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE NOR CRITICAL INFORMATION FROM ALL MEDICAL DOCTORS IS IRRESPONSIBLE AND UNFITTING FOR A LEADER UNLESS IT IS A SELF SERVING FACIST DICTATORSHIP OR TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENT.
TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION TO THE PEOPLE OF ALL OUTCOMES AND POTENTIAL HARMS THAT A HEALTH PRODUCT IS PRESENTING IS AGAINST THE MEDICAL CODE OF ETHICS AND IT IS CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. TO BE INFLUENCED TO BELIEVE IN AN IDEA THAT ONE HEALTH OPTION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION FOR PEOPLE IS IMMATURE AND AN IRRESPONSIBLE LACK OF BEING WELL INFORMED BY PROFESSIONALS IN THE FIELD. THIS KIND OF TUNNEL VISION PERSPECTIVE IS NOT ONLY DANGEROUS FOR HUMANITY BUT IT RISKS TO FAVOR ONE SOURCE WHO THEN MONOPOLIZES THE OUTCOME USING ONLY THEIR SOLUTIONS WHILE EXCLUDING ALL OTHER VIABLE POSSIBILITIES. TO MAKE SUCH DECISIONS BASED ON ADVOCATES OF A COMPANY PROMOTING THE SOLUTION IS DOWNRIGHT DUMB AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
A WELL ROUNDED ADVISORY COMMITTEE EXPERIENCED IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE WHO DO NOT FAVOR ANY SINGLE CORPORATION OR SOLUTION SHOULD OFFER ALL VIABLE METHODS TO ANY HEALTH CRISIS AS THERE ARE MANY SOLUTIONS TO CURE A DISEASE. HUMAN BEINGS ALL HAVE VARYING HEALTH CONDITIONS AND A REMEDY FOR ONE IS NOT THE SAME FOR ANOTHER. WORSE WHAT CREATES NO REACTIONS FOR ONE MAY RESULT IN HARM OR DEATH FOR ANOTHER AS WE HAVE CLEARLY WITNESSED WITH THE EXPERIMENTAL INJECTIONS FOR COVID.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code
Introduction
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject.
The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
REQUIRING THAT A PERSON TAKE A RISK THAT MAY THREATEN THEIR WELL BEING OR LIFE TO FULFILL A VACCINE EXPERIMENT MANDATED BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR COVID WHEN IT IS EASILY TREATABLE USING OTHER MEDICAL OPTIONS EARLY ON IS NOT ONLY TERRIFYING BUT A CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF ONE’S HUMAN RIGHTS TO CHOOSE THEIR HEALTH OPTIONS. THIS IS PARTICULARLY TRUE FOR THOSE WITH SENSITIVITIES TO MEDICATIONS OR WITH UNDERLYING HEALTH CONDITIONS WHO FEAR POTENTIAL DEATH OR FUTURE HARM FROM AN EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE MANDATE. CERTAINLY THE VACCINES WERE NOT STUDIED LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW THE AFFECTS TO PERSONS OF VARYING AGES AND HEALTH CONDITIONS. THEREFORE MANDATING SUCH AN EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION IS ASKING PEOPLE TO RISK THEIR LIVES OR THEIR LIVELIHOODS, BOTH OF WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO LIVE AND SURVIVE. A PERSON SHOULD BE FREE TO FOLLOW THEIR OWN INSTINCT AND INNER WISDOM WHEN IT COMES TO THEIR HEALTH NEEDS. THEIR IS NO GREATER PSYCHOLOGICAL THREAT TO ONES LIFE AND FREEDOM TO LIVE THAN TO STRIP THEM OF THEIR RIGHT TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN HEALTH OPTIONS.
COMPOUNDING THE TURMOIL OF THE VIRUS ATTACK BY PENALIZING PERSONS WITH LOSS OF THEIR LIVELIHOODS AND JOBS IF THEY DO NOT GET THE VACCINE THEY FEAR MAY ROB THEM OF THEIR LIVES IS NOT ONLY A CRUEL FORM OF THE WORST KIND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL COERCION BUT ILLEGAL AND CRIMINAL. TO COMMAND SUCH CRUEL MANDATES AT A TIME WHEN MILLIONS ARE SEEKING TO RECOVER FROM THE TRAUMA OF LOSING THEIR INCOME WHILE LIVING IN CONSTANT FEAR FOR THEIR LIFE AND THE HEALTH OF THEIR LOVED ONES FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS NON STOP IS AN INCOMPREHENSIBLE LACK OF EMPATHY AND COMPASSION. SUCH MANDATES ONLY ADD MORE TRAUMA BY THREATENING ONE’S VERY EXISTENCE ON ALL LEVELS.
A PRESIDENT HOLDS THE MOST RESPONSIBLE POSITION OF ANYONE IN THE WORLD WHEN IT COMES TO COMMUNICATING. IF A PRESIDENT IS FEARFUL AND DESPERATE THEN HE OR SHE CONVEYS THIS TO THE PEOPLE AND THEY WILL REFLECT THE SAME. IT IS VERY IRRESPONSIBLE AND MISLEADING FOR A PRESIDENT OR POLITICIAN TO CONDEMN ANYONE OR ANY GROUP OR SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION FOR STANDING UP FOR THEIR FREEDOMS. TO DO SO SETS A DANGEROUS PRECEDENCE OF THE SAME SENTIMENTS AMONGST THE PEOPLE AND CAN DIVIDE THE POPULOUS AND CREATE CONFLICT WIDESPREAD AS WE NOW WITNESS IN AMERICA AND OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD AMONGST THE VACCINATED CONDEMNING THE UNVACCINATED. AS A PARROT HEARS SO A PARROT REPEATS. NO THINKING REQUIRED. IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL TO BE A SPOKESPERSON FOR BIG PHARMA AND MANDATE SINGULAR HEALTH OPTIONS SUCH AS VACCINES WHEN OTHER REMEDIES THAT CAN CURE AT HOME HAVE BEEN PROVEN SUCCESSFUL. OFFERING PEOPLE NO OTHER OPTIONS BESIDES VACCINES WITHOUT EVEN BEING A MEDICAL DOCTOR NOR HAVING EVEN CONSULTED A COMMITTEE OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL DOCTORS ON AN ADVISORY BOARD IS CRIMINAL. IT IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO MISUSE ROLES OF LEADERSHIP OR INFLUENCE EITHER BY WEALTH OR FAME OR POLITICS BASED ON MISINFORMATION AND LACK OF INTELLIGENCE AND CLARITY.
ADDING PAIN TO INJURY BY PROPOSING A POTENTIALLY HARMFUL EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE MANDATE THAT THREATENS TO TAKE AWAY PEOPLES JOBS IF THEY ARE NOT VACCINATED WHILE ENDING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR THOSE STRUGGLING AND TRYING TO GO BACK TO WORK IS A MAXIMUM LEVEL OF PATHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL TORTURE. IT IS SEVERELY CRUEL AND ETHICALLY WRONG. THIS KIND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL THREAT COMPOUNDED UPON YEARS OF WITNESSING ONES PRIOR KNOWN LIFE FALL APART IS AN INCOMPREHENSIBLE FORM OF TORTURE TO THE MASSES. THIS AN EXAMPLE OF A SICK AND CRUEL METHOD OF TOTALITARIAN TORTURE. THOSE PARTICIPATING IN IT AND CONDONING IT SHOULD FACE MAXIMUM LEGAL SCRUTINY.
WHAT PEOPLE NEED NOW DURING THEIR RECOVERY TO RECLAIM AND REBUILD THEIR LIVES AFTER THE COVID.TRAUMA IS COMPASSIONATE ASSISTANCE, ENCOURAGEMENT AND CARE NOT THREATS OF MORE DAMAGE, ATTACKS ON THEIR LIFE, HEALTH AND MORE LOSS.
PRESIDENT VACCINE BIDEN REALLY NEEDS TO DIVORCE HIMSELF FROM BIG PHARMA AND FAUCI FOR THE WELL BEING OF THE PEOPLE AND SEEK ADVICE FROM A PANEL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL EXPERTS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INTERESTS.
